Article Sidebar

Submitted
January 21, 2020
Accepted
February 10, 2020
Published
February 25, 2020
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 576 Download : 203

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to examine the factors that affect the likelihood companies choose the method of fair value for investment properties. Factors in this research consisted of debt levels, the size of the company, information asymmetry and companies in the property industry (control variables).  The population of this research is company publicly traded listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange 2010-2015 period. The sample selection using purposive sampling, the type of data used is secondary data obtained from the official website of the Stock Exchange. The hypothesis tested using a binomial logit regression models. The results of this study indicate that the level of debt significantly influence the possibility of the selection method for the fair value of investment property. This suggests that the high or low levels of debt may affect the selection of the fair value method. The size of the company, information asymmetry and companies in the property industry did not significantly affect the possibility of the selection method for the fair value of investment property. This suggests that the high or low of company size, and information asymmetry in the property industry has no impact on the possibility of the selection method for the fair value of investment property

Keywords

Fair value method The level of debt Company size Information asymmetry

Article Details

License

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Hak Cipta (Copyright)

Penulis yang mempublikasikan naskahnya pada Jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:

Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.

  1. Penulis mengakui bahwa Jurnal  Current : Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi dan Bisnis Terkini berhak sebagai yang mempublikasikan pertama kali dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  2. Penulis dapat memasukan tulisan secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-ekskulif  dari naskah yang telah terbit di jurnal ini kedalam versi yang lain (misal: dikirim ke respository institusi penulis, publikasi kedalam buku, dll), dengan mengakui bahwa naskah telah terbit pertama kali pada Jurnal  Current :Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi dan Bisnis Terkini.
How to Cite
Mulyanti, S. P. S., Damayanti, Y. ., & Yunilma, Y. (2020). KEMUNGKINAN PEMILIHAN METODE NILAI WAJAR BAGI PERUSAHAAN YANG MELAPORKAN PROPERTI INVESTASI . CURRENT: Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi Dan Bisnis Terkini, 1(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.31258/jc.1.1.21-35
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Azlina, N. (2009). Pengaruh Tingkat Perputaran Modal Kerja. Struktur Modal dan Skala Perusahaan terhadap Profitabilitas. Pekbis Jurnal Vol. 1 No 2.
  2. Beatty, A., Weber, J., & Yu, J. J. (2008). Conservatism and Debt. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45, 154 – 174.
  3. Christensen, H. B., Nikolaev, V. (2009). Who Uses Fair-Value Accounting for Non-Financial Assets Following IFRS Adoption? Working Paper No. 09-12. The University of Chicago Booth School Of Business.
  4. Epstein, C. J., & Jermakowicz, E. K. (2010). Interpretation and application of IFRS. John Wiley & Sons.
  5. Fatun, A. N. (2013). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kecenderungan Kecurangan (Fraud): Persepsi Pegawai Dinas Provinsi DIY. Skripsi Akuntansi. Universitas Negeri Semarang.
  6. Farahmita, (2014). Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kemungkinan Memilih Metode Nilai Wajar Untuk Properti Investasi. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi 17. Universitas Mataram.
  7. Febria, R. L. (2013). Pengaruh Leverage dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Profitabilitas. Universitas Negeri padang.
  8. Ghozali, I. (2013). Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS. Semarang: Universitas Dipenegoro Press.
  9. Gladney, J. (2011). An Analysis of Fair Value Accounting in the Banking Industry. (Dec, 2011). http://ssrn.com/abstract:2181153,diakses pada 3/6/2014.
  10. Ishak, H. S., Tahir, H. H. M., Ibrahim, M. K., & Wahab, W. A. E. (2012). Determinants of Accounting for Investment Property (FRS 140) in Property Sector: Evidence from Malaysia. Research paper presented at 3rd International Conference on Business and Economic Research. March 2012. Bandung: Indonesia.
  11. Laux, C., & Leuz, C. (2010). Did fair-value Accounting Contribute to the Financial Crisis?. Journal Of Economic Perspektif volume 24, number 1, winter, pp 93-118
  12. Muller. K.A., Riedl, E. J., & Sellhorn. T. (2008). Causes and Consequences of Choosing Historical Cost versus Fair Value. Working paper. Harvard Business School.
  13. Munawir. S. (2004). Analisa Laporan Keuangan Edisi keempat. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
  14. Nurhasanah. (2012). Pengaruh Rasio Aktivitas, Struktur Modal, Ukuran perusahaan dan Umur Perusahaan terhadap profitabilitas pada Perusahaan Food and Beverages yang Terdaftar di BEI. Jurnal UNRI.
  15. PSAK No. 13. (2015). Properti Investasi. Dewan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan.
  16. PSAK No. 68. (2015). Pengukuran Nilai Wajar. Dewan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan.
  17. Quagli. A., & Avallone. F. (2010). Fair Value or Cost Model? Drivers of Choice for IAS 40 in the Real Estate Industri. European Accounting Review. Vol 19. No. 3. 461 – 493.
  18. Rahmawati, Y. S. & Qomariyah, N. (2005). Pengaruh Asimetri Informasi Terhadap Praktik Manajemen Laba Pada Perusahaan Perbankan Publik yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Jakarta. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi 9. Padang.
  19. Schipper, K. (2007). Required Disclosures in Financial Reports. The Accounting Review. 82(2), p. 301–326.
  20. Suwito, E. & Herawaty, A. (2005). Analisis Pengaruh Karakteristik Perusahaan Terhadap Tindakan Perataan Laba yang Dilakukan oleh Perusahaan Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Jakarta. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi VIII .Solo.15-16 September.
  21. Watts, R. & Zimmerman, J. L. (1986). Positive Accounting Theory. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  22. Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1990). Positive Accounting Theory: A Ten Year Perspective. American Accounting Association, 131-156.
  23. Weston, C. (1992). Manajerial Finance, 9th Ed. Florida: The Dyden Press.