Isi Artikel Utama

Abstrak

This study analyzed 925 Scopus-indexed documents from 2000–2024 using RStudio Bibliometrix to map trends, collaborations, and the evolution of green accounting research themes. Results show an 11.59% annual growth in publications, with Schaltegger and Gray as lead authors, and a shift in key topics from carbon accounting to biodiversity and accountability. Findings highlight a collaboration gap between developed and developing countries, and the dominance of institutions from the Global North, while engagement in developing countries remains low. This research contributes to scholarship by mapping international collaborations, understanding critical themes, and providing a roadmap for globally inclusive research. Practical implications include recommendations for cross-border collaboration and the development of integrated carbon reporting standards to drive business transitions toward sustainability. This study is limited by its data collection solely from English-language Scopus documents and its quantitative bibliometric approach. Consequently, qualitative aspects and other sources of basic data remain unexplored. Future research is recommended to incorporate content analysis and expand the data coverage for more comprehensive results.

Rincian Artikel

Cara Mengutip
Rahman, A., & Rohman, A. (2025). GLOBAL TRENDS AND THEMATIC DYNAMICS IN GREEN ACCOUNTING RESEARCH (2000–2024): A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF SCOPUS PUBLICATIONS. CURRENT: Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi Dan Bisnis Terkini, 6(3), 731–745. https://doi.org/10.31258/current.6.3.731-745

Referensi

  1. Açik Taşar, S. (2023). A Bibliometric Analysis Related To Green Accounting. R&S - Research Studies Anatolia Journal, 6(4), 636–651. Https://Doi.Org/10.33723/Rs.1363543
  2. Agustini, A. T., & Arifa, C. (2024). Climate Change Accounting And Disclosure: A Systematic Literature Review. The Indonesian Accounting Review, 14(1), 25–41. Https://Doi.Org/10.14414/Tiar.V14i1.3829
  3. Bebbington, J., & Unerman, J. (2018). Achieving The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(1), 2–24. Https://Doi.Org/10.1108/Aaaj-05-2017-2929
  4. Brabete, V., Sichigea, M., Cîrciumaru, D., & Goagără, D. (2024). Bibliometric Mapping Of The Relationships Between Accounting, Professional Accountants, And Sustainability Issues. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(21). Https://Doi.Org/10.3390/Su16219508
  5. Burritt, R. L., & Schaltegger, S. (2010). Sustainability Accounting And Reporting: Fad Or Trend? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(7), 829–846. Https://Doi.Org/10.1108/09513571011080144
  6. Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The Bibliometric Analysis Of Scholarly Production: How Great Is The Impact? Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809–1831. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S11192-015-1645-Z
  7. Fàbregues, S., & Guetterman, T. C. (2024). Editorial : Mixed Methods Research Systematic Methodological Reviews — Bene Fi Ts , Challenges , And Solutions. Journal Of Mixed Methods Research, 19(1), 6–17. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/15586898241302592
  8. Khomsiyah, Gunawan, J., & Nilawati, Y. J. (2023). Green Accounting, Environmental Accounting, And Sustainability: A Current And Future Opportunity. Afre Accounting And Financial Review, 6(2), 202–211. Https://Doi.Org/10.26905/Afr.V6i2.10554
  9. Lee, C.-H., & Lin, C.-H. (2019). Green Accounting: Developing Versus Developed Economies. Journal Of Economic And Social Thought, 6(3), 1–5. Https://Doi.Org/10.1453/Jest.V6i3.1943
  10. Miller, C. J., Smith, S. N., & Pugatch, M. (2020). Experimental And Quasi-Experimental Designs In Implementation Research. Psychiatry Research, 283(1), 112452. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Psychres.2019.06.027
  11. Owen, D., Gray, R., & Bebbington, J. (1997). Green Accounting : Cosmetic Irrelevance Or Radical Agenda For Change ? Asia-Pacific Journal Of Accounting, December, 175–197. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/10293574.1997.10510519
  12. Özyürek, H. (2024). A Bibliometric Analysis Of Green Accounting , Environmental Accounting And Green Business Publications In A Global Perspective. Science And Technology Publications, Lda, 115–122. Https://Doi.Org/10.5220/0012845000003764
  13. Qian, W., Hörisch, J., & Schaltegger, S. (2018). Environmental Management Accounting And Its Effects On Carbon Management And Disclosure Quality. Journal Of Cleaner Production, 174, 1608–1619. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Jclepro.2017.11.092
  14. Shahverdi, N., Saffari, A., & Amiri, B. (2025). A Systematic Review Of Artificial Intelligence And Machine Learning In Energy Sustainability : Research Topics And Trends. Energy Reports, 13(January), 5551–5578. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Egyr.2025.05.021
  15. UNEP. (2024). Emission Gap Report 2024. Https://Www.Unep.Org/Resources/Emissions-Gap-Report-2024. (Accessed August 11, 2025)
  16. Widyastuti, T. (2024). Exploring The Influence Of Green Accounting On Sustainability Performance: A Literature Review. Greenation International Journal Of Economics And Accounting, 2(1), 53–60. Https://Doi.Org/10.38035/Gijea.V2i1.166
  17. Yulianto, A., Novi, A., & Nila, B. (2025). Journal Of Applied Accounting And Landscape Of Sustainability Accounting : Past , Present , And Future Using Bibliometric Analysis 2009-2024. 1(1). Https://Journal.Uny.Ac.Id/Publications/Jaatr/Article/View/944
  18. Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods In Management And Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/1094428114562629