Main Article Content

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of regional financial independence and financial effectiveness on the quality of public services in Indonesia. It underscores the significance of public sector accounting particularly the analytical use of local government financial statements as a crucial instrument for evaluating fiscal accountability and enhancing service delivery performance. Employing secondary data from 1,620 local governments over the 2021-2023 period, the analysis utilizes panel data regression with a random effects model. The empirical results reveal that fiscal independence exerts a positive and significant impact on service quality, whereas financial effectiveness demonstrates a negative relationship. These findings indicate that transparent and accountable fiscal capacity tends to foster better service outcomes, while effectiveness without adequate governance oversight may lead to inefficiencies and misallocation of resources. Despite the limited observation period and the use of a single service quality indicator, this study makes a theoretical contribution by offering an integrated framework that connects fiscal autonomy, governance quality, and public service performance within a decentralized setting. From a policy standpoint, the results call for a paradigm shift from efficiency-oriented fiscal management toward a governance-driven fiscal strategy that prioritizes accountability, transparency, and citizen-centered service improvement.

Keywords

effectiveness independence regional finance quality of public service

Article Details

Author Biographies

Rahma Masdar, Universitas Tadulako, Palu

Dosen S1 Akuntansi

Andi Chairil Furqan, Universitas Tadulako, Palu

Wakil Dekan Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Tadulako

How to Cite
Fadhilah, A., Masdar, R., Furqan, A. C., & Masruddin. (2025). THE INFLUENCE OF REGIONAL FINANCIAL INDEPENDENCE AND EFFECTIVENESS ON THE QUALITY OF PUBLIC SERVICES . CURRENT: Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi Dan Bisnis Terkini, 6(3), 596–606. https://doi.org/10.31258/current.6.3.596-606

References

  1. Afonso, A., Jalles, J. T., & Venâncio, A. (2024). Fiscal decentralization and public sector efficiency. European Journal of Political Economy, 82, 102493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2024.102493
  2. Akay, E., Demirci, Ş., & Karataş, A. (2021). Public service quality and citizen satisfaction: Evidence from local government services. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(3), 455–470. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa045
  3. Apriza, S. (2021). The Ombudsman’s compliance score as a measure of public service quality in Indonesia. Journal of Governance, 6(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.31506/jog.v6i1.12450
  4. Cahyanti, R., Wijayanti, L., & Pramono, S. (2018). Public service quality improvement through Ombudsman compliance scores: Evidence from Salatiga Health Department. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi, 15(2), 112–123.
  5. Deng, Y. (2024). Fiscal effectiveness and public service delivery: Evidence from East Asian local governments. Asian Journal of Public Administration, 46(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02598272.2023.2275213
  6. Digdowiseiso, K., & Kaliwattu, B. (2023). Fiscal autonomy and local government performance: Evidence from Indonesia. Public Sector Economics, 47(2), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.3326/pse.47.2.3
  7. Furqan, A. C., Wardhani, R., & Martani, D. (2020). Financial performance and accountability of local governments: The case of Indonesia. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1798065. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1798065
  8. Indonesia, R. of. (2021). Regulation of the Minister of Home Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia Number 58 of 2021 concerning the Code, Data, and Government Administration Area [Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia Nomor 58 Tahun 2021 tentang Kode, Data, dan Wilayah . Ministry of Home Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia.
  9. Indonesia, R. of. (2022). Decree of the Minister of Home Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia Number 050-145 of 2022 concerning the Code, Data, and Government Administration Area [Keputusan Menteri Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia Nomor 050-145 Tahun 2022 tentang Kode, Data, dan Wi. Ministry of Home Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia.
  10. Iskandar, A. (2021). Local fiscal independence and service quality in Indonesian regional governments. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 18(2), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2021.09
  11. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (2019). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  12. Kurniawan, A. (2016). Pelayanan publik di Indonesia: Teori dan praktik. Prenadamedia Group.
  13. Lanin, D., & Hermanto, A. (2019). The effect of service quality on citizen satisfaction and trust in local government. Journal of Governance, 4(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.31506/jog.v4i1.5783
  14. Mahmudi. (2010). Analisis laporan keuangan pemerintah daerah. UPP STIM YKPN.
  15. Mardiasmo. (2009). Akuntansi sektor publik. Andi.
  16. Martínez-Vázquez, J., Lago-Peñas, S., & Sacchi, A. (2017). The impact of fiscal decentralization: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(4), 1095–1129. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12182
  17. Masdar, M., Nugroho, A., & Ratmono, D. (2021). Financial transparency and follow-up of audit recommendations in Indonesian local governments. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 33(5), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-04-2020-0059
  18. Milán-García, J., Muñoz-Pérez, M. E., & Cuesta-González, M. (2022). Local government efficiency: Reviewing determinants. Sustainability, 14(4), 2331. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042331
  19. Negeri, K. D. (2018). Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri tentang pedoman pengelolaan keuangan daerah. Kementerian Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia.
  20. Programme, U. N. D. (1996). Good governance and sustainable human development. UNDP.
  21. Putri, D. I., & Mutiarin, D. (2018). Public service quality in Southeast Asia: A comparative study. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 4(2), 101–115.
  22. Republik Indonesia. (2014). Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah. Sekretariat Negara. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/38685/uu-no-23-tahun-2014
  23. Republik Indonesia. (2009). Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 tentang Pelayanan Publik. Sekretariat Negara. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/38748/uu-no-25-tahun-2009
  24. Rivenbark, W. C., Roenigk, D. J., & Allison, G. S. (2010). Conceptualizing financial condition in local government. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 22(2), 149–177. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-22-02-2010-B002
  25. Salomo, R., & Rahmayanti, L. (2023). Budget effectiveness and public service performance in Indonesian local governments. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 14(1), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jamal.2023.14.1.04
  26. Setiawan, A., Prabowo, H., & Widodo, A. (2022). The paradox of budget effectiveness in Indonesian local governments. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 7(3), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-03-2021-0034
  27. Shidqi, H. A., & Arfiansyah, A. (2023). Internal audit, corruption, and public service performance in Indonesian local governments. International Journal of Public Administration, 46(12), 935–947. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2022.2130231
  28. Shinohara, H. (2023). Fiscal capacity, governance, and local public services in Japan. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 45(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2022.2160864
  29. Wang, X., Guo, H., & Yuan, F. (2024). Fiscal autonomy and local service delivery: Evidence from China. Public Administration Review, 84(2), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13652
  30. Wardhani, R., Rossieta, H., & Martani, D. (2017). Good governance and the impact of government spending on local government performance in Indonesia. International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management, 3(1), 77–102. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPSPM.2017.081221
  31. Yang, Z. (2020). Budget effectiveness and governance outcomes in Asian local governments. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 86(3), 498–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852318801152