Article Sidebar

Submitted
November 17, 2025
Accepted
February 27, 2026
Published
March 1, 2026
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 19 Download : 9

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study maps existing research streams and future directions on Management Control Systems (MCS) and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG). Using a bibliometric approach, 319 Scopus-indexed journal articles were analyzed with VOSviewer. Bibliographic coupling and co-word analysis were employed to examine the knowledge structure, dominant themes, and research gaps within the MCS–ESG literature.The findings show that prior research predominantly emphasizes integrative frameworks and implementation strategies that position MCS as a mechanism for supporting ESG objectives, particularly through performance measurement, strategic decision-making, and accountability systems. Four major research clusters emerge, illustrating the evolving role of MCS in sustainability governance. The analysis also highlights promising avenues for future studies, including digital transformation, sustainability accounting innovation, and the strategic integration of MCS to enhance ESG performance across sectors.This study contributes by explicitly framing MCS as a governance mechanism rather than merely a reporting tool. It provides a conceptual roadmap for scholars and offers practical insights for managers, system designers, and policymakers seeking to align ESG objectives with control systems to advance sustainable development.

Keywords

Management Control Systems ESG Sustainability Reporting Corporate Governance Bibliometric Analysis

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Halimahtussakdiah Halimahtussakdiah, Eny Wahyuningsih

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Hak Cipta (Copyright)

Penulis yang mempublikasikan naskahnya pada Jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:

Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.

  1. Penulis mengakui bahwa Jurnal  Current : Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi dan Bisnis Terkini berhak sebagai yang mempublikasikan pertama kali dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  2. Penulis dapat memasukan tulisan secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-ekskulif  dari naskah yang telah terbit di jurnal ini kedalam versi yang lain (misal: dikirim ke respository institusi penulis, publikasi kedalam buku, dll), dengan mengakui bahwa naskah telah terbit pertama kali pada Jurnal  Current :Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi dan Bisnis Terkini.
How to Cite
Halimahtussakdiah, H., & Wahyuningsih, E. (2026). MANAGEMENT CONTROL SYSTEMS IN ESG-BASED GOVERNANCE: MAPPING RESEARCH STREAMS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS . CURRENT: Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi Dan Bisnis Terkini, 7(1), 183–197. https://doi.org/10.31258/current.7.1.183-197
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. References.
  2. Abdel-Basset, M., & Mohamed, M. (2020a). A novel decision-making model for sustainable supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247, 119–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119156
  3. Abdel-Basset, M., & Mohamed, R. (2020b). A novel plithogenic TOPSIS- CRITIC model for sustainable supply chain risk management. 247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119586
  4. Adams, C. (2007). Sustainability Reporting and Accountability. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570710748553
  5. Adams, C. A. (2017). Conceptualising the contemporary corporate value creation process. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(4), 906–931. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2016-2529
  6. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
  7. Arjaliès, D.-L., & Mundy, J. (2013). The use of management control systems to manage CSR strategy: A levers of control perspective. Management Accounting Research, 24(4), 284–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.06.003
  8. Asiaei, K., Bontis, N., Alizadeh, R., & Yaghoubi, M. (2022). Green intellectual capital and environmental management accounting: Natural resource orchestration in favor of environmental performance. 31(1), 76–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2875
  9. Asiaei, K., Bontis, N., Barani, O., Moghaddam, M., & Sidhu, J. (2022). The role of sustainability control systems in translating CSR into performance in Iran. 60(5), 1438–1468. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-11-2020-1510
  10. Bartolomeo, M., Bennett, M., Bouma, J. J., Heydkamp, P., James, P., & Wolters, T. (2000). Environmental management accounting in Europe: current practice and future potential. European Accounting Review, 9(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/096381800407932
  11. Berry, A. J., Coad, A. F., Harris, E. P., Otley, D. T., & Stringer, C. (2009). Emerging themes in management control: A review of recent literature. British Accounting Review, 41(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2008.09.001
  12. Broadus, R. N. (1987). Toward a definition of bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 12(5–6), 373–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016680
  13. Burritt, R. L., Christ, K. L., Rammal, H. G., & Schaltegger, S. (2019). Multi-level governance of sustainability transitions in the Asia-Pacific: a conceptual framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 212, 1063–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.234
  14. Burritt, R. L., Herzig, C., Schaltegger, S., & Viere, T. (2019). Diffusion of environmental management accounting for cleaner production: Evidence from some case studies. 224, 479–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.227
  15. Burritt, R. L., & Saka, C. (2006). Environmental management accounting applications and eco-efficiency: case studies from Japan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(14), 1262–1275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.08.012
  16. Burritt, R. L., & Schaltegger, S. (2010). Sustainability accounting and reporting: Fad or trend? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(7), 829–846. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513571011080144
  17. Callon, M., Courtial, J.-P., Turner, W. A., & Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22(2), 191–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901883022002003
  18. Christ, K. L., & Burritt, R. L. (2013). Environmental Management Accounting: The Significance of Contingent Variables for Adoption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 41, 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.10.007
  19. Contrafatto, M., & Burns, J. (2013). Social and environmental accounting, organisational change and management accounting: A processual view. Management Accounting Research, 24(4), 349–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.10.004
  20. contributors, W. (2025). Scopus. In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scopus
  21. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An analysis and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  22. Durden, C. (2008). Towards a socially responsible management control system. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21(5), 671–694. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570810872969
  23. Elsevier. (2025). 100 million reasons to trust Scopus. In Scopus Blog. https://blog.scopus.com/100-million-reasons-to-trust-scopus/
  24. Ferretti, P., Gonnella, C., & Martino, P. (2024). Integrating sustainability in management control systems: an exploratory study on Italian banks. 32(7), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-03-2023-1954
  25. Flanagan, R., & Norman, G. (1993). Risk Management and Construction. Blackwell Science.
  26. Frame, J. D. (2003). Book Review: Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. 8TH Edition. Project Management Journal, 34(4), 59. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697280303400409
  27. Geng, Y., Chen, W., Zhang, L., Xue, B., & Fujita, T. (2020). Bibliometric review on sustainable supply chain management: 1997–2019. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120762
  28. George, R. A., Siti-Nabiha, A. K., Jalaludin, D., & Abdalla, Y. A. (2016). Barriers to and enablers of sustainability integration in the performance management systems of an oil and gas company. 136, 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.097
  29. Gond, J.-P., Grubnic, S., Herzig, C., & Moon, J. (2012). Configuring management control systems: Theorizing the integration of strategy and sustainability. Management Accounting Research, 23(3), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2012.06.003
  30. Gunarathne, N., & Lee, K.-H. (2021). Corporate cleaner production strategy development and environmental management accounting: A contingency theory perspective. 308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127402
  31. Gunarathne, N., Samudrage, D., Wijesinghe, D. N., & Lee, K.-H. (2016). Fostering social sustainability management through safety controls and accounting: A stakeholder approach in the mining sector. Accounting Research Journal, 29(2), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-04-2015-0062
  32. Günther, E., Endrikat, J., & Guenther, T. W. (2016). Environmental management control systems: a conceptualization and a review of the empirical evidence. 136, 147–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.043
  33. Henri, J.-F., & Journeault, M. (2010). Eco-control: The influence of management control systems on environmental and economic performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.02.001
  34. Hillson, D. (2002). Extending the risk process to manage opportunities. International Journal of Project Management, 20(3), 235–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00074-6
  35. Hsu, C.-W., Lee, W.-H., & Chao, W.-C. (2013). Materiality analysis model in sustainability reporting: a case study at Lite-On Technology Corporation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 57, 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.040
  36. Jasch, C. (2003). The use of Environmental Management Accounting (EMA) for identifying environmental costs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11(6), 667–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00107-5
  37. Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(1), 10–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140103
  38. Kivilä, J., Martinsuo, M., & Vuorinen, L. (2017). Sustainable project management through project control in infrastructure projects. 35(6), 1167–1183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.02.009
  39. Lueg, R., & Radlach, R. (2016). Managing sustainable development with management control systems: A literature review. 34(2), 158–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2015.11.005
  40. Maas, K., Schaltegger, S., & Crutzen, N. (2016a). Advancing the integration of corporate sustainability measurement, management and reporting. 133, 859–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.006
  41. Maas, K., Schaltegger, S., & Crutzen, N. (2016b). Integrating corporate sustainability assessment, management accounting, control, and reporting. 136, 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.008
  42. Maas, K., Schaltegger, S., & Crutzen, N. (2016c). Reprint of Advancing the integration of corporate sustainability measurement, management and reporting. 136, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.055
  43. Martínez-Falcó, J., Sánchez-García, E., Marco-Lajara, B., & Zaragoza-Sáez, P. (2025). Green intellectual capital and sustainable competitive advantage: unraveling role of environmental management accounting and green entrepreneurship orientation. 26(1), 104–129. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-07-2024-0204
  44. Mishra, P., & Pandey, R. (2025). Tracking the global evolution of ESG: A bibliometric perspective. Environmental Sciences Europe, 37(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-025-01184-9
  45. Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2023). The All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) scheme used in Scopus: Structure, coverage and applications. Publications, 11(4), 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications11040051
  46. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024003910
  47. Perez-Valls, M., Cespedes-Lorente, J., & Moreno-Garcia, J. (2016). Green Practices and Organizational Design as Sources of Strategic Flexibility and Performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(8), 529–544. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1881
  48. Pizzetti, M. (2021a). Corporate governance and ESG: The role of the board in sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 170(2), 345–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04677-5
  49. Pizzetti, M. (2021b). CSR Communication on Social Media: Insights from Stakeholder Engagement. Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2731
  50. Qian, W., Hörisch, J., & Schaltegger, S. (2018). Environmental management accounting and its effects on carbon management and disclosure quality. 174, 1608–1619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.092
  51. Rehman, S. U., Bhatti, A., Kraus, S., & Ferreira, J. J. M. (2020). The role of environmental management control systems for ecological sustainability and sustainable performance. 59(9), 2217–2237. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-06-2020-0800
  52. Scarpellini, S., Marín-Vinuesa, L. M., Aranda-Usón, A., & Portillo-Tarragona, P. (2020). Dynamic capabilities and environmental accounting for the circular economy in businesses. 11(7), 1129–1158. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-04-2019-0150
  53. Scarpellini, S., Marín-Vinuesa, L. M., Portillo-Tarragona, P., & Moneva, J. M. (2020). Defining and measuring different dimensions of financial resources for business eco-innovation and the influence of the firms’ capabilities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119135
  54. Schaltegger, S. (2018a). Linking Corporate Sustainability and Management Control Systems. Meditari Accountancy Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-01-2018-0274
  55. Schaltegger, S. (2018b). Linking Environmental Management Accounting: A Reflection on (Missing) Links to Sustainability and Planetary Boundaries. 38(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2017.1395351
  56. Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. (2018). Business cases and corporate engagement with sustainability: Differentiating ethical motivations. 147(2), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2938-0
  57. Schaltegger, S., & Csutora, M. (2012a). Carbon accounting for sustainability and management. Status quo and challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 36, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.06.024
  58. Schaltegger, S., & Csutora, M. (2012b). Carbon accounting for sustainability and management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 36, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.06.024
  59. Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2006). Integrative management of sustainability performance, measurement and reporting. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 3(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijaape.2006.010098
  60. Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2012). Integrative management of sustainability performance, measurement and reporting. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 8(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAAPE.2012.046249
  61. Souza, L., Gomes, G., & Leite, R. (2024). The scientific evolution of ESG: A bibliometric analysis. Revista Gestão & Sustentabilidade Ambiental, 13(3), 1–20. https://rgsa.openaccesspublications.org/rgsa/article/view/9479
  62. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2009). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
  63. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. In Measuring Scholarly Impact (pp. 285–320). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13
  64. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111(2), 1053–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7
  65. Wijethilake, C., & Lama, T. (2019a). Management controls as enablers of eco-innovation: Evidence from emerging economy SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 225, 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.295
  66. Wijethilake, C., & Lama, T. (2019b). Sustainability core values and sustainability risk management: Moderating effects of top management commitment and stakeholder pressure. 28(1), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2245
  67. Zou, P. X. W., Zhang, G., & Wang, J.-Y. (2007). Understanding the key risks in construction projects in China. International Journal of Project Management, 25(6), 601–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.03.001
  68. Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2014). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629.