ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN KINERJA KEUANGAN RISK-BASED BANK RATING PADA BANK UMUM SYARIAH DAN BANK UMUM KONVENSIONAL DI INDONESIA PERIODE 2016-2020 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RBBR FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE IN BUS AND BUK IN INDONESIA FOR THE 2016-2020 PERIOD

Main Article Content

Niken Hustilah
Yudi Yudi
Riski Hernando

Abstract

This research was conducted with the aim of knowing the financial performance and soundness of Islamic Commercial Banks and Conventional Commercial Banks using the RBBR (Risk Based-Bank Rating) method with aspects of Risk Profile (NPL/NPF, and LDR/FDR), Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Earnings (ROA, ROE, and BOPO), and Capital (CAR). This research is a comparative quantitative study that was analyzed using the Independent Sample T-Test and Mann Whitney. The results of this study show that there are significant differences in the financial performance of Islamic Commercial Banks and Conventional Commercial Banks in terms of the NPL/NPF ratio, while for the ratio of LDR/FDR, GCG, ROA, ROE, BOPO, and CAR there is no significant difference in the financial performance of Islamic Commercial Banks and Conventional Commercial Banks. The soundness level of Islamic commercial banks is in a better condition than conventional commercial banks in the ratio of LDR/FDR, while the NPL/NPF, ROA, ROE, and BOPO ratios of conventional commercial banks are in better condition than Islamic commercial banks. GCG Aspect and CAR are in the same good health condition as Islamic Commercial Banks and Conventional Commercial Banks

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hustilah, N., Yudi, Y., & Hernando, R. (2022). ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN KINERJA KEUANGAN RISK-BASED BANK RATING PADA BANK UMUM SYARIAH DAN BANK UMUM KONVENSIONAL DI INDONESIA PERIODE 2016-2020: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RBBR FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE IN BUS AND BUK IN INDONESIA FOR THE 2016-2020 PERIOD. CURRENT: Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi Dan Bisnis Terkini, 3(2), 191-208. https://doi.org/10.31258/current.3.2.191-208
Section
Articles

References

Amelia, E., & Aprilianti, A. C. (2018). Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank: Pendekatan CAMEL & RGEC (Studi pada Bank Maybank Syariah Indonesia Periode 2011-2016). Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Islam, 6(2), 189–207.
Asraf, A., Yurasti, Y., & Suwarni, S. (2020). Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Keuangan Bank Syariah Mandiri dengan Bank Mandiri Konvensional. MBIA, 18(3), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.33557/mbia.v18i3.751
Bank Indonesia. (2011). Peraturan Bank Indonesia No.13/1/PBI/2011 Tentang Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank. In Peraturan Bank Indonesia (pp. 1–31).
Beby, A. (2019). Analisis Perbandingan Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Syariah dan Bank Konvensional dengan Menggunakan Metode RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Cooporate Governance, Earnings and Capital). Trilogi Accounting and Business Research, 01(01), 100–122. https://dx.doi.org/10.10022/tabr.2019.08.10022
Bilal, Z. O., Durrah, O. M., & Atiya, T. M. (2016). Comparative Study on Performance of Islamic Banks and Conventional Banks: Evidence from Oman. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(4), 1835–1841.

Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS for Windows. In Semarang: BP Undip. Semarang : Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Kristianingsih. (2019). Penggunaan Metode Risk Governance Earnings Capital untuk Perbandingan Kinerja Keuangan pada Bank Umum Pemerintah dan Bank Umum Swasta Nasional di Indonesia. Sigma-Mu, 11(1), 49–62.
Lupa, W., Parengkuan, T., & Sepang, J. (2016). Analisis Perbandingan Tingkat Kesehatan Perbankan Syariah dengan Perbankan Konvensional dengan Metode CAMEL. Jurnal Berkala Ilmiah Efisiensi, 16(01), 694–705.
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2016). Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 04/POJK.03/2016 Tentang Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Umum. In Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (p. 33).
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2017a). Ikhtisar Perbankan. https://ojk.go.id/id/kanal/perbankan/ ikhtisar-perbankan/Pages/Lembaga-Perbankan.aspx
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2017b). Statistik Perbankan Indonesia 2017. In Statistik Perbankan Indonesia 2017 (Vols. 16, No. 1, p. 195).
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2017c). Surat Edaran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 14/SEOJK.03/2017 Tentang Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Umum. In Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (p. 33).
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2019). Statistik Perbankan Desember 2019. In Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Indonesia Desember 2019 (Vol. 12, Issue 1).
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2020). Snapshot Perbankan Syariah Indonesia 2020 (Posisi Desember 2020). In Snapshot Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (pp. 1–6).
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2021). Roadmap Pengembangan Perbankan Syariah Indonesia 2020-2025. https://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/syariah/berita-dan-kegiatan/publikasi/Pages/ Roadmap-Pengembangan-Perbankan-Syariah-Indonesia-2020-2025.aspx
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. jakarta: alfabeta.
Sukmawati, N. M. E., & Purbawangsa, I. B. A. (2016). Pengaruh Pertumbuhan Dana Pihak Ketiga, Pertumbuhan Kredit, Risiko Kredit, Likuiditas, dan Kondisi Ekonomi terhadap Profitabilitas. E-Jurnal Manajemen Unud, 5(9), 248723.
Sulisnaningrum, E. (2019). Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Bank dengan Metode CAMEL pada Bank Muamalat dan Bank Syariah Mandiri di Surabaya. Akuntansi Jaya Negara, 11(1), 1–9.
Sulistianingsih, H., & Maivalinda. (2018). Analisis Perbandingan Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Konvensional dan Bank Syariah dengan Menggunakan Pendekatan RGEC. Menara Ekonomi, IV(1), 39–47.
Suyanto, & Gio, P. U. (2017). Statistika Nonparametrik dengan SPSS, Minitab, dan R. Medan: USU Press.
Thayib, B., Murni, S., & Maramis, J. B. (2017). Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Keuangan Bank Syariah dan Bank Konvensional. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 5(2), 1759–1768.