Article Sidebar

Submitted
November 11, 2023
Accepted
July 7, 2024
Published
July 27, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 42 Download : 25

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of climate change disclosure and political connections on corporate financial performance with president director’s financial expertise as a moderator. Currently, climate change disclosure involves various parties, especially companies that are increasingly aware of the impact of climate change on corporate sustainability. Climate change disclosure is the process of providing information about the impacts, actions, and strategies taken by companies related to climate change. This research was conducted on food and beverage sub-sector manufacturing sector companies listed on the IDX in 2020-2022. The sample used amounted to 54 units of analysis. The data analysis technique uses moderated regression analysis (MRA).The results showed that political connections affect financial performance, but climate change disclosure has no effect on financial performance. The results also showed that president director’s was unable to moderate the effect of climate change disclosure or political connections on financial performance. The results of this study also support the resource dependency theory which states that companies will adjust to the external environment to secure resources controlled by the government. In the context of this study, political connections are considered an invisible resource that can give companies a competitive advantage.

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Ekawati Ekawati

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Hak Cipta (Copyright)

Penulis yang mempublikasikan naskahnya pada Jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:

Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.

  1. Penulis mengakui bahwa Jurnal  Current : Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi dan Bisnis Terkini berhak sebagai yang mempublikasikan pertama kali dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  2. Penulis dapat memasukan tulisan secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-ekskulif  dari naskah yang telah terbit di jurnal ini kedalam versi yang lain (misal: dikirim ke respository institusi penulis, publikasi kedalam buku, dll), dengan mengakui bahwa naskah telah terbit pertama kali pada Jurnal  Current :Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi dan Bisnis Terkini.
How to Cite
Ekawati, E. (2024). APAKAH KEAHLIAN KEUANGAN DIREKTUR UTAMA DAPAT MEMODERASI PENGARUH PENGUNGKAPAN PERUBAHAN IKLIM DAN KONEKSI POLITIK TERHADAP KINERJA KEUANGAN? : DOES PRESIDENT DIRECTOR’S FINANCIAL EXPERTISE MODERATE THE EFFECT OF CLIMATE CHANGE DISCLOSURE AND POLITICAL CONNECTIONS ON FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE?. CURRENT: Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi Dan Bisnis Terkini, 5(2), 248–264. https://doi.org/10.31258/current.5.2.248-264
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2006). Economic origins of dictatorship and democracy. Cambridge University Press.
  2. Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C. R. (1996). Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31(3), 377–397.
  3. Ahmad, D. M. (2005). Good Corporate Governance: Konsep dan Penerapannya di Indonesia. Ray Indonesia, Jakarta.
  4. Alabdullah, T. T. Y., Ahmed, E. R., & Kanaan-Jebna, A. (2022). Corporate governance system and firm financial performance. Acta Scientific COMPUTER SCIENCES Volume, 4(6).
  5. Aldhamari, R., Mohamad Nor, M. N., Boudiab, M., & Mas’ ud, A. (2020). The impact of political connection and risk committee on corporate financial performance: evidence from financial firms in Malaysia. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(7), 1281–1305.
  6. Alsaifi, K., Elnahass, M., & Salama, A. (2020). Carbon disclosure and financial performance: UK environmental policy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(2), 711–726.
  7. Arisadi, Y. C., & Djazuli, A. (2013). Pengaruh ukuran perusahaan, umur perusahaan, current ratio, debt to equity ratio dan fixed asset to total asset ratio terhadap kinerja keuangan pada perusahaan manufaktur di bursa efek Indonesia. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 11(4), 567–574.
  8. Arumona, J., Erin, O., Onmonya, L., & Omotayo, V. (2019). Board financial education and firm performance: Evidence from the healthcare sector in Nigeria. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 1–18.
  9. Azizah, F., & Al Amin, M. (2020). Pengaruh Koneksi Politik Terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Sektor Pertambangan yang terdaftar di BEI tahun 2014-2018). Indonesian Journal of Accounting and Governance, 4(1), 1–17.
  10. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
  11. Botosan, C. A. (1997). Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital. Accounting Review, 323–349.
  12. Brigham, E. F., & Ehrhardt, M. C. (2013). Financial Management: Theory & Practice (Book Only). Cengage Learning.
  13. Brigham, E. F., & Houston, J. F. (2021). Fundamentals of financial management: Concise. Cengage Learning.
  14. Brouwers, R., Schoubben, F., & Van Hulle, C. (2018). The influence of carbon cost pass through on the link between carbon emission and corporate financial performance in the context of the European Union Emission Trading Scheme. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8), 1422–1436.
  15. Certo, S. T. (2003). Influencing initial public offering investors with prestige: Signaling with board structures. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 432–446.
  16. Chariri, A., & Ghozali, I. (2007). Teori akuntansi. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 409.
  17. Christiyaningsih. (2022, September 1). Kerugian Indonesia Akibat Perubahan Iklim Bisa Capai 40 Persen PDB di 2050. Www.Ekonomi.Republika.Co.Id. https://ekonomi.republika.co.id/berita/rhi10t459/kerugian-indonesia-akibat-perubahan-iklim-bisa-capai-40-persen-pdb-di-2050
  18. cnbc Indonesia. (2023). Cnbc Indonesia. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20230607113139-4-443748/era-sby-jokowi-sama-saja-industri-ini-jadi-makin-hancur
  19. CNBC Indonesia. (2023, June 23). Era SBY & Jokowi Sama Saja: Industri Ini Jadi Makin Hancur! Www.Cnbcindonesia.Com. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20230607113139-4-443748/era-sby-jokowi-sama-saja-industri-ini-jadi-makin-hancur
  20. Cotter, J., & Najah, M. M. (2013). Corporate climate change disclosure practices and regulation: the influence of institutional investors. Institutional Investors’ Power to Change Corporate Behavior: International Perspectives, 5, 81–97.
  21. Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures–a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal.
  22. Dinç, I. S. (2005). Politicians and banks: Political influences on government-owned banks in emerging markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 77(2), 453–479.
  23. Dj, A. M., Artini, L. G. S., & Suarjaya, A. A. G. (2012). Pengaruh kinerja keuangan terhadap nilai perusahaan pada perusahaan manufaktur di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen, Strategi Bisnis, Dan Kewirausahaan, 6(2), 130–138.
  24. Donaldson, L. (1990). The ethereal hand: Organizational economics and management theory. Academy of Management Review, 15(3), 369–381.
  25. Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–136.
  26. Eissa, A. M., & Eliwa, Y. (2021). The effect of political connections on firm performance: evidence from Egypt. Asian Review of Accounting, 29(3), 362–382. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-05-2020-0064
  27. El-Chaarani, H., & Abraham, R. (2022). The Impact of Corporate Governance and Political Connectedness on the Financial Performance of Lebanese Banks during the Financial Crisis of 2019–2021. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(5), 203.
  28. Emirzon, J. (2006). Regulatory Driven Dalam Implementasi Prinsip-Prinsip Good Corporate Governance Pada Perusahaan di Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen & Bisnis Sriwijaya, 4(8), 93–114.
  29. Faccio, M. (2006). Politically connected firms. American Economic Review, 96(1), 369–386.
  30. Faccio, M. (2010). Differences between politically connected and nonconnected firms: A cross‐country analysis. Financial Management, 39(3), 905–928.
  31. Faccio, M., Masulis, R. W., & McConnell, J. J. (2006). Political connections and corporate bailouts. The Journal of Finance, 61(6), 2597–2635.
  32. Fahmi, I. (2012). Analisis Kinerja Keuangan: Panduan bagi Akademisi, Manajer, dan Investor untuk Menilai dan Menganalisis Bisnis dari Aspek Keuangan.
  33. Finch, N. (2005). The motivations for adopting sustainability disclosure. Macquaarie Graduate School of Management. Social Science Research Network, 2005–2017.
  34. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: a stakeholder approach, Pitman. Boston, MA.
  35. Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 25.
  36. Gibson, M. S. (2003). Is corporate governance ineffective in emerging markets? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38(1), 231–250.
  37. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness’. In Source: American Journal of Sociology (Vol. 91, Issue 3).
  38. Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting: a review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47–77.
  39. Gustiana, R., Nor, W., & Hudaya, M. (2019). Pengaruh Corporate Governance dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan dan Firm Value dengan Substainability Reporting sebagai Variabel Intervening. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi & Perpajakan (JRAP), 6(02), 81–96.
  40. Guthrie, J., & Parker, L. D. (1990). Corporate social disclosure practice: a comparative international analysis. Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 3, 159–175.
  41. Guthrie, J., Petty, R., Yongvanich, K., & Ricceri, F. (2004). Using content analysis as a research method to inquire into intellectual capital reporting. Journal of Intellectual Capital.
  42. Hamid, K. T. (2021). The Moderating Effect Of Corporate Governance On The Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance Of Listed Non-Financial Services Companies in Nigeria.
  43. Haninun, H., Lindrianasari, L., & Denziana, A. (2018). The effect of environmental performance and disclosure on financial performance. Int. J. Trade and Global Markets, 11(1/2), 138–148.
  44. Hardiyansah, M., AGUSTINI, A. T., & PURNAMAWATI, I. (2021). The effect of carbon emission disclosure on firm value: environmental performance and industrial type. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(1), 123–133.
  45. Hasnati. (2014). Komisaris Independen dan Komite Audit, Organ Perusahaan yang Berperan Untuk Mewujudkan Good Corporate Governance di Indonesia (A. Dwi Sulistya, Ed.; Pertama). Absolute Media.
  46. Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2001). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1–3), 405–440.
  47. Hery, A. L. K. (2016). Integrated and comprehensive edition. Jakarta: Grasindo.
  48. Hsu, H. (2017). Environmental information disclosure and firm performance. 2017 International Conference on Economics, Finance and Statistics (ICEFS 2017), 483–487.
  49. Huang, C.-L., & Kung, F.-H. (2010). Drivers of environmental disclosure and stakeholder expectation: Evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 435–451.
  50. Idris, F., Buchdadi, A., Muttaqien, M., & Hariguna, T. (2020). The role of the board of director with political connection for increasing the firm value. Accounting, 6(7), 1285–1290.
  51. Innayah, M. N., & Pratama, B. C. (2022). Political Connection and Board Characteristic’s effect on Financial Performance: Evidence from Indonesian Banking Firm. ICBAE 2022: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference of Business, Accounting, and Economics, ICBAE 2022, 10-11 August 2022, Purwokerto, Central Java, Indonesia, 230.
  52. Iriyadi, I., & Antonio, Y. (2021). Climate Change Disclosure Impact on Indonesian Corporate Financial Performance. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 8(2), 117–127.
  53. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
  54. Kabir, R., & Thai, H. M. (2017). Does corporate governance shape the relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance? Pacific Accounting Review, 29(2), 227–258.
  55. Kristanto, A. T. (2019). Pengaruh political connections terhadap kinerja perusahaan. EXERO: Journal of Research in Business and Economics, 2(1), 1–21.
  56. Kumar, P., & Firoz, M. (2022). Does Accounting-based Financial Performance Value Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Disclosures? A detailed note on a corporate sustainability perspective. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 16(1), 1–33.
  57. Kyere, M., & Ausloos, M. (2021). Corporate governance and firms financial performance in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(2), 1871–1885.
  58. La Porta, R., Lopez‐de‐Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. The Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517.
  59. Lin, J., & Qamruzzaman, M. (2023). The impact of environmental disclosure and the quality of financial disclosure and IT adoption on firm performance: Does corporate governance ensure sustainability? Frontiers in Environmental Science.
  60. Lu, W., Zhu, N., & Zhang, J. (2021). The Impact of Carbon Disclosure on Financial Performance under Low Carbon Constraints. Energies, 14(14), 4126.
  61. Maaloul, A., Chakroun, R., & Yahyaoui, S. (2018). The effect of political connections on companies’ performance and value: Evidence from Tunisian companies after the revolution. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 8(2), 185–204.
  62. Maji, S. G., & Kalita, N. (2022). Climate change financial disclosure and firm performance: empirical evidence from Indian energy sector based on TCFD recommendations. Society and Business Review.
  63. Napitupulu, I. H., Situngkir, A., Basuki, F. H., & Nugroho, W. (2020). Optimizing good corporate governance mechanism to improve performance: case in Indonesia’s manufacturing companies. Global Business Review, 0972150920919875.
  64. Niazi, M., Othman, Z., & Chandren, S. (2021). The moderating role of director’s financial expertise in political connections and corporate financial performance in Pakistan. Accounting, 7(4), 865–874.
  65. Nor, N. M., Bahari, N. A. S., Adnan, N. A., Kamal, S. M. Q. A. S., & Ali, I. M. (2016). The effects of environmental disclosure on financial performance in Malaysia. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, 117–126.
  66. O’donovan, G. (2002). Environmental disclosures in the annual report: Extending the applicability and predictive power of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 344–371.
  67. Permatasari, F., & Widianingsih, L. P. (2020). Pengungkapan corporate social responsibility terhadap kinerja keuangan dengan good corporate governance sebagai variabel moderasi. Jurnal Media Akuntansi Dan Perpajakan Indonesia, 1(2), 1–22.
  68. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford University Press.
  69. Pratiwi, I., & Suryani, B. (2023, April 15). OPINI: Era Baru Laporan Berkelanjutan untuk Iklim. Https://Opini.Harianjogja.Com. https://opini.harianjogja.com/read/2023/04/15/543/1132267/opini-era-baru-laporan-berkelanjutan-untuk-iklim
  70. Primayogha, E. (2021, August 25). Rangkap Jabatan, Timses, Hingga Mantan Terpidana Korupsi: Cacat Integritas dan Potensi Konflik Kepentingan Dalam Pengangkatan Direksi & Komisaris BUMN. Https://Antikorupsi.Org/. https://antikorupsi.org/id/article/rangkap-jabatan-timses-hingga-mantan-terpidana-korupsi-cacat-integritas-dan-potensi-0
  71. PT. Indofood Sukses Makmur. (2022). Laporan Tahunan 2022.
  72. PT. Indofood Sukses Makmur, Tbk. (2019). Annual Report.
  73. Rokhlinasari, S. (2016). Teori-teori dalam pengungkapan informasi corporate social responbility perbankan. Al-Amwal: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Perbankan Syari’ah, 7(1).
  74. Ross, S. A. (1973). The economic theory of agency: The principal’s problem. The American Economic Review, 63(2), 134–139.
  75. Ross, S. A. (1977). The determination of financial structure: the incentive-signalling approach. The Bell Journal of Economics, 23–40.
  76. Rudianto. (2012). Pengantar akuntansi : konsep dan teknik penyusunan laporan keuangan. Erlangga.
  77. Saeed, A., Belghitar, Y., & Clark, E. (2019). Political connections and corporate performance: Evidence from Pakistan. Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, 27(4), 863–889.
  78. Saidu, S. (2019). CEO characteristics and firm performance: focus on origin, education and ownership. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 9(1), 29.
  79. Santika, Erlina. F. (2023, October 12). Emisi Gas Rumah Kaca Industri RI Naik pada 2022, Ini Komponennya. Www.Databoks.Katadata.Co.Id. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2023/10/12/emisi-gas-rumah-kaca-industri-ri-naik-pada-2022-ini-komponennya
  80. Schaltegger, S., Hörisch, J., & Freeman, R. E. (2019). Business cases for sustainability: A stakeholder theory perspective. Organization & Environment, 32(3), 191–212.
  81. Sedarmayanti. (2012). Good Governance dan Good Corporate Governance (Edisi Revi). CV. Mandar Maju.
  82. Sekaran, U. (2017). Buku Metode Penelitian untuk Bisnis (Edisi 6). Bandung: Salemba Empat.
  83. Siddique, M. A., Akhtaruzzaman, M., Rashid, A., & Hammami, H. (2021). Carbon disclosure, carbon performance and financial performance: International evidence. International Review of Financial Analysis, 75, 101734.
  84. Soekanto, S. (2004). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum.
  85. Soleman, M. R., Van Rate, P., & Maramis, J. B. (2022). Pengaruh umur perusahaan, likuiditas, ukuran perusahaan dan leverage terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Textil dan Garmen yang terdaftar di BEI periode 2013-2018. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 10(2).
  86. Spence, M. (1978). Job market signaling. In Uncertainty in economics (pp. 281–306). Elsevier.
  87. SR Asia. (2022, December 27). Apa Sebenarnya Isi dari Sustainability Report? https://majalahcsr.id/apa-sebenarnya-isi-dari-sustainability-report/
  88. Stefany, J., & Agustina, L. (2022). Do Corporate Social Responsibility and Political Connections Matter to Financial Performance and Financial Stability in the Banking Sector? Evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning.
  89. Stern, N. H. (2007). The economics of climate change: the Stern review. cambridge University press.
  90. Stubbington, T., & Nauman, B. (2020, October 28). Investors probe ESG credentials of bond sellers on ‘greenwashing’ fears Booming green debt market stokes concern over issuers’ environmental and social bona fides. Financial Times. https:/www.ft.com/content/1bcbad16-f69e-47db-82fa-0419d674bb53
  91. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.
  92. Sudana, I. M. (2019). Manajemen keuangan teori dan praktik. Airlangga University Press.
  93. Sudarmanto, E., Susanti, E., Revida, E., Pelu, M. F. A. R., Purba, S., Astuti, A., Purba, B., Silalahi, M., Anggusti, M., & Sipayung, P. D. (2021). Good Corporate Governance (GCG). Yayasan Kita Menulis.
  94. Sugiyono, D. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D.
  95. Sugiyono, P. D. (2006). Statistika untuk penelitian. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta, 21.
  96. Sumartini, N. K. A., & Widhiyani, N. L. S. (2014). Pengaruh opini audit, solvabilitas, ukuran kap dan laba rugi pada audit report lag. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 9(1), 392–409.
  97. susanto, androni, & fiona. (2022). Tata Kelola Perusahaan Memoderasi Hubungan Corporate Social Responsibility dan Kinerja Keuangan. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 32(10), 2944–2958.
  98. Sutedi, A. (2011). Good corporate governance. Sinar Grafika.
  99. Tang, S. (2022). The Effect Of Corporate Governance and Political Connection On Firm Performance in Indonesian Stock Exchange. Media Ekonomi, 30(2).
  100. TCFD, F. S. B. (2017). Final Report: Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate Related Financial Disclosures. Financial Stability Board Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures, Available at: Www. Fsb-Tcfd. Org/Wp-Content/Uploads/2017/06/FINAL-TCFD-Report-062817. Pdf (Accessed 15 January 2018).
  101. UNFCCC. (1998). Kyoto Protocol To The United Nations Framework Convention On Climate Change.
  102. UNFCCC. (2007). Reducing emissions from deforestation in developing countries.
  103. UNFCCC. (2016). Paris Agreement.
  104. Utomo, M. N. (2019). Ramah Lingkungan dan Nilai Perusahaan. Jakad Media Publishing. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=aJTZDwAAQBAJ
  105. Wahyuni, S. (2020). Metoda Penelitian Akuntansi & Managemen Panduan Lengkap Menulis: Skripsi, Tesis, Disertasi, dan Publikasi Ilmiah (Pertama). UPP STIM YKPN.
  106. Widiatmika, P. H., & Darma, G. S. (2018). Good Corporate Governance, Job Motivation, Organization Culture Which Impact Company Financial Performance. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis, 15(3), 82–99.
  107. Wilmshurst, T. D., & Frost, G. R. (2000). Corporate environmental reporting: A test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 13(1), 10–26.
  108. Zanial Fahmi Firdaus. (2023). Neraca Arus Energi dan Neraca Emisi Gas Rumah Kaca Indonesia 2017-2021.
  109. Zhu, K., Kraemer, K. L., & Xu, S. (2006). The process of innovation assimilation by firms in different countries: a technology diffusion perspective on e-business. Management Science, 52(10), 1557–1576