Article Sidebar

Submitted
June 10, 2024
Accepted
July 27, 2024
Published
July 27, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 99 Download : 52

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between audit committee, financial industry, audit firm, firm size to key audit matters (KAM) in Indonesia. A disclosure index approach is employed from the International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 701 and a regression run on a population of Kompas100 Index for the first implementation year in 2022. The hypothesis was assessed utilizing the Multiple Linear Statistical Test, with the analysis performed at a significance level of 0.05. The results of regression analysis indicate that the size of audit committee significantly influences KAM disclosures. A statistically insignificant relationship was found between the financial industry, audit firm, firm size and KAM. The research acknowledges the existence of a positive and statistically significant correlation between the characteristics of the audit committee, financial industry, choice of audit firm, firm size, and the disclosure of KAM within the country. This study also reports the empirical results of the first-time implementation of KAM, such as auditor market share, as well as the number of KAM topics disclosed. The results revealed that the number of reported KAM in Indonesia is significantly lower compared to neighboring countries such as Singapore. Regulatory bodies in Indonesia, could conduct further analysis to determine whether the current enhancement auditor's report is adequate and meets investor expectations. This research improves our understanding of the extent of KAM disclosure and the specific factors in Indonesia, thereby improving the knowledge of policymakers and decision-makers regarding KAM disclosure in audit reports.

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Luthfi Ferizqi, Reskino

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Hak Cipta (Copyright)

Penulis yang mempublikasikan naskahnya pada Jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:

Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.

  1. Penulis mengakui bahwa Jurnal  Current : Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi dan Bisnis Terkini berhak sebagai yang mempublikasikan pertama kali dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  2. Penulis dapat memasukan tulisan secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-ekskulif  dari naskah yang telah terbit di jurnal ini kedalam versi yang lain (misal: dikirim ke respository institusi penulis, publikasi kedalam buku, dll), dengan mengakui bahwa naskah telah terbit pertama kali pada Jurnal  Current :Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi dan Bisnis Terkini.
How to Cite
Ferizqi, L., & Reskino, R. (2024). DETERMINASI PENGUNGKAPAN KEY AUDIT MATTERS DI INDONESIA: BUKTI DARI INDEKS KOMPAS100: DETERMINATION OF DISCLOSURE OF KEY AUDIT MATTERS IN INDONESIA: EVIDENCE FROM THE COMPASS100 INDEX. CURRENT: Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi Dan Bisnis Terkini, 5(2), 325–337. https://doi.org/10.31258/current.5.2.325-337
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. ACRA, ISCA, ACCA, & NTU. (2017). Embracing Transparency, Enhancing Value: A first year review of the enhanced auditor’s report in Singapore. https://www.acra.gov.sg/docs/default-source/default-document-library/training-and-resources/publications/other-useful-resources/Review_of_implementation_of_EAR.pdf
  2. Coram, P. J., & Wang, L. (2021). The effect of disclosing key audit matters and accounting standard precision on the audit expectation gap. International Journal of Auditing, 25(2), 270–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12203
  3. Djamil, N. (2023). Trading in Influence: Modus Baru dalam Korupsi Indonesia Tahun 2022 dan Paradoks Kriminalisasi. JAAMTER: Jurnal Audit Akuntansi Manajemen Terintegrasi, 1 (4), 294–304.
  4. Djamil, N. (2023). Pelanggaran Prinsip Etika Audit dalam Dysfunctional Audit Behavior: Violation of Audit Ethics Principles in Dysfunctional Audit Behavior. JAAMTER: Jurnal Audit Akuntansi Manajemen Terintegrasi, 1 (3), 164–177.
  5. Ferreira, C., & Morais, A. I. (2020). Analysis of the relationship between company characteristics and key audit matters disclosed. Revista Contabilidade e Financas, 31(83), 262–274. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201909040
  6. Flannery, M. J., Kwan, S. H., & Nimalendran, M. (2013). The 2007-2009 financial crisis and bank opaqueness. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 22(1), 55–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2012.08.001
  7. Ghosh, A. (Aloke), Jarva, H., & Ryan, S. G. (2020). Bank Regulation/Supervision and Bank Auditing. SSRN Electronic Journal.
  8. Ghozali, I. (2018). Application of Multivariatr Analysis with The IBM SPSS 25 Program. Diponegoro University Publishing Agency.
  9. Gold, A., & Heilmann, M. (2019). The consequences of disclosing key audit matters (KAMs): A review of the academic literature. Maandblad Voor Accountancy En Bedrijfseconomie, 93(1/2), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.5117/mab.93.29496
  10. IAASB. (2011). Enhancing the Value of Auditor Reporting : Exploring Options for Change. May, 1–14. https://www.ifac.org/system/files/publications/exposure-drafts/CP_Auditor_Reporting-Final.pdf
  11. IAASB. (2015). International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 701, Communicating Key Audit Matters in The Independent Auditor’s Report.
  12. Ismail, H., Atqa, A. A., & Hassan, H. (2018). First Time Reporting of Key Audit Matters (KAM) by Malaysian Auditors. In International Journal of Engineering & Technology (Vol. 7). www.sciencepubco.com/index.php/IJET
  13. Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. (1976), “Theory of the firm”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, pp. 305-360
  14. Mah’d, O. A., & Mardini, G. H. (2022). Matters may matter: The disclosure of key audit matters in the Middle East. Cogent Economics and Finance, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2111787
  15. Özcan, A. (2021). What Factors Affect the Disclosure of Key Audit Matters? Evidence from Manufacturing Firms ? International Journal of Management Economics and Business, 17(1), 149–162.
  16. Pinto, I., & Morais, A. I. (2019). What matters in disclosures of key audit matters: Evidence from Europe. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 30(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/jifm.12095
  17. Suttipun, M. (2020). Factors Influencing Key Audit Matters Reporting in Thailand. Asian Journal of Accounting Perspectives, 13(1), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.22452/ajap.vol13no1.2
  18. Tjendra, H., & Soedibyo, A. N. (2023). Implementation of Key Audit Matters Communication in The Independent Auditor’s Report of The Financial Statements of PT KYZ. Contemporary Accounting Case Studies, 2(2), 222–242.
  19. Velte, P. (2020). Associations between the financial and industry expertise of audit committee members and key audit matters within related audit reports. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 21(1), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-10-2018-0163
  20. Widianingrum, R., & Wijayati, N. (2023). Implementation Readiness of Key Audit Matters at KAP ABC. Contemporary Accounting Case Studies, 23(1), 451–469.